Graphic design is more than aesthetics—it’s about problem-solving and storytelling. Yet, one of the biggest hurdles designers face isn’t in creating the work but in navigating the subjectivity of those reviewing it.
While design principles provide structure, the way people interpret a design often depends on personal taste, experiences, and expectations. We’ll explore the challenges of subjectivity in design and how to begin bridging the gap between creative intention and stakeholder perception.
A double-edged sword
Subjectivity is both a challenge and an opportunity in design. It allows for creative freedom and diverse perspectives but also opens the door to rejection based on personal preferences rather than strategic alignment. For example, one stakeholder might find a concept “innovative,” while another sees it as “too bold.”
This tension arises because graphic design exists at the intersection of universal principles and individual interpretation. While hierarchy, contrast, and balance guide quality, they don’t always guarantee universal approval.
How to frame your work to overcome subjectivity
1. Anchor the conversation in strategy.
Before presenting a concept, ground the discussion in the objectives of the project. Explain how the design addresses the problem or fulfills a goal, shifting the focus from personal taste to measurable outcomes.
2. Educate on design principles.
Highlight how elements like color, typography, and layout contribute to achieving the desired results. When stakeholders understand the rationale behind your decisions, they’re more likely to see the value of your work.
3. Anticipate subjective reactions.
Prepare for potential objections by considering how someone with no design background might interpret your choices. Proactively address these points during your presentation to demonstrate your thoughtfulness and expertise.
When good ideas get dismissed
Every designer knows the frustration of seeing a well-thought-out idea rejected—not because it’s ineffective but because it’s misunderstood, or perhaps because it didn’t originate from the stakeholder’s own mind. These challenges are often less about the design itself and more about a lack of trust or a gap in understanding between the stakeholder and the designer.
Why good ideas are often misunderstood
Clients or stakeholders may dismiss bold or unconventional concepts because they don’t fully grasp the thought process behind them. Resistance typically stems from a lack of context or alignment rather than the quality of the idea. Bridging this gap requires designers to be not only creators but also educators and communicators.
Strategies to address the understanding gap
1. Start with the story behind the design.
Before unveiling the visuals, explain the research, insights, and goals that shaped your decisions. This establishes a logical foundation for your creative choices.
2. Anticipate questions and concerns.
Think about potential objections or areas of confusion. For example, if a color palette might feel unexpected, explain how it aligns with the brand’s goals or speaks to the target audience.
3. Invite dialogue.
Encourage stakeholders to share their perspectives. By engaging them in a conversation, you can better understand their concerns and work collaboratively toward a solution.
4. Use comparisons.
Show alternate designs alongside your preferred concept to highlight its strengths. Visual comparisons can help stakeholders see why your approach stands out.
Overcoming creative bias
Creative bias arises when personal preferences or snap judgments override an objective evaluation of a design. It can occur when stakeholders view a design through the lens of their own taste or expectations rather than its alignment with the project’s goals or audience needs.
Creative bias is a silent barrier that many designers encounter. It’s the “I don’t like it” reaction that dismisses a design without considering its strategic intent. This challenge becomes even more difficult when designers aren’t given the chance to explain their work, leaving ideas unexamined and undervalued.
What to do when you’re not allowed to explain
1. Provide context within the presentation.
If you won’t have the opportunity to explain your work verbally, let the materials do some of the heavy lifting. Include written rationales or captions that highlight:
• The problem the design addresses.
• The thinking behind specific elements.
• Why the design aligns with the project’s goals.
2. Leverage data and insights.
Use research or metrics to back up your decisions. For example, if you’ve chosen a particular layout or color scheme, cite studies or case studies that demonstrate its effectiveness in similar scenarios.
3. Tell a visual story.
Structure your presentation so it walks viewers through the thought process. Start with the problem, highlight key insights, and conclude with the solution.
4. Focus on building trust over time.
While it’s frustrating to have work dismissed, building long-term credibility with stakeholders can reduce the frequency of these situations. When clients trust your expertise, they’re more likely to value your ideas, even without detailed explanations.
Navigating difficult clients and conversations
When creative bias persists, use it as an opportunity to strengthen your approach. Empathize with stakeholders’ perspectives, find common ground, and, when necessary, offer alternative executions that align with the project’s objectives. Compromise may be part of the process, but it doesn’t have to come at the expense of your vision.
Need help optimizing your creative development process? We can help.
